A guided approach to AI tutoring
Many general-purpose AI tools are built to respond to a wide range of prompts. Socraitic is positioned differently: as a school learning assistant using Socratic questioning and learning materials selected by the school.
Use questions and prompts to encourage recall, explanation and reasoning.
Keep the experience curriculum-led and based on materials approved for the school’s intended use.
Explore a school AI tutoring experience within the Microsoft Teams environment.
These describe Socraitic’s intended product approach, not a guarantee that every response will be correct or appropriate. Schools should review the product, configuration and supporting evidence for their own context.
What schools should review before choosing an AI tutor
An AI tutor is still an AI system. Before a pilot, school leaders and relevant colleagues should review the actual service and agree how it will be used.
Socraitic’s own school information explains that data flows, storage locations, subprocessors and deployment boundaries should be reviewed for the proposed deployment. A Teams interface alone should not be treated as proof of where data is stored or processed.
A sensible way to evaluate an AI tutor
- Define the pilot. Choose a limited subject, year group and learning purpose.
- Complete due diligence. Include teaching, safeguarding, IT and data protection colleagues.
- Agree success measures. Consider learning quality, accuracy, pupil experience, staff workload and safety.
- Keep human oversight clear. Make responsibilities and routes for asking for help understandable to staff and pupils.
- Review and decide. Use feedback and evidence to continue, adjust or stop the pilot.
Related information
- Read the practical guide to AI in schools, including safeguarding, data protection and a tool evaluation checklist.
- Read the Department for Education’s guidance on generative AI in education (applies to England).
- Read the DfE guidance on generative AI and data protection in schools.